Complexity, circular causality,
amplification loop, type 1 and type 2 change, systemic design, reflection, 180°
approach, etc. What do these expressions have in common? The systemic approach.
At the same time, there is not one systemic approach but several systemic
approaches, and the systemic approach in coaching has a specific character. Brian Bonar suggests how
it is necessary to understand coaching and how to stay motivated to do well in
a life coach's role.
From Systemic Approach to Specific Approach
The systemic approach does not
describe a specific approach but a set of approaches. It is thus found in many
disciplines: ecology, decision support, strategy, economics, philosophy,
anthropology, cybernetics, or even therapy and coaching. Systemic approaches
all have in common that they are based on the general theory of systems
developed by Ludwig von Bertalanffy, an Austrian biologist. Any system,
especially a human system, can be analyzed in a relevant way with general
systems theory. The "systemic" approach invites researchers, leaders,
managers, etc., to look at and think about the world with different reading
grids that we did not learn at school. It is where Brian Bonar can be of great help to you.
Our learning comes from a
so-called Aristotelian or Cartesian way of thinking, separating the elements
and analyzing them in detail. This type of thinking is useful for the
complicated (repairing a car, for example), but it is ill-suited for thinking
about complexity. However, most existing systems are complex. Thus, through
systemic approaches, it is shown that looking at any type of situation is more
relevant as a complex set of interactions. The lessons don't stop there. Brian Bonar can explain
how to do better and grow in your personal and professional life.
What is the Systemic Approach in Coaching?
Two types of systemic can be
applied in coaching. They do not cover the same theoretical foundations.
Systemic Thinking to Make People See Things Differently in Coaching
Some coaches have developed an
essentially "intrapsychic" approach to coaching. The currents are
varied: psychoanalysis, personality typology, and transactional analysis. It
has, of course, its strengths and its limits. In executive, team, or
organizational coaching, it will be useful to introduce systemic thinking to
help the client take a step back. For example, in team coaching, systems
thinking teaches us that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
Therefore, observing the interactions between the members/elements of a team
will be more helpful in advancing the team system than the qualification of the
qualities of the different members of the team or even the search for
dysfunctional team members. It is an important factor to realize, according to Brian Bonar.
We know that resonance effects are to be sought
in coaching. It is referred to as a parallel process or systemic reflection.
If, in session, the coach feels a deep annoyance in contact with his client,
this annoyance is likely a reflection of what the client usually arouses with
those around him. It is essential to realize that professionals like Brian Bonar can make it easier
to understand how to adopt the ideal approach to perform a task.
Comments
Post a Comment