What Brian Bonar Has to Say on Coaching?

 Complexity, circular causality, amplification loop, type 1 and type 2 change, systemic design, reflection, 180° approach, etc. What do these expressions have in common? The systemic approach. At the same time, there is not one systemic approach but several systemic approaches, and the systemic approach in coaching has a specific character. Brian Bonar suggests how it is necessary to understand coaching and how to stay motivated to do well in a life coach's role.

From Systemic Approach to Specific Approach

The systemic approach does not describe a specific approach but a set of approaches. It is thus found in many disciplines: ecology, decision support, strategy, economics, philosophy, anthropology, cybernetics, or even therapy and coaching. Systemic approaches all have in common that they are based on the general theory of systems developed by Ludwig von Bertalanffy, an Austrian biologist. Any system, especially a human system, can be analyzed in a relevant way with general systems theory. The "systemic" approach invites researchers, leaders, managers, etc., to look at and think about the world with different reading grids that we did not learn at school. It is where Brian Bonar can be of great help to you.

Our learning comes from a so-called Aristotelian or Cartesian way of thinking, separating the elements and analyzing them in detail. This type of thinking is useful for the complicated (repairing a car, for example), but it is ill-suited for thinking about complexity. However, most existing systems are complex. Thus, through systemic approaches, it is shown that looking at any type of situation is more relevant as a complex set of interactions. The lessons don't stop there. Brian Bonar can explain how to do better and grow in your personal and professional life.

What is the Systemic Approach in Coaching?

Two types of systemic can be applied in coaching. They do not cover the same theoretical foundations.

Systemic Thinking to Make People See Things Differently in Coaching

Some coaches have developed an essentially "intrapsychic" approach to coaching. The currents are varied: psychoanalysis, personality typology, and transactional analysis. It has, of course, its strengths and its limits. In executive, team, or organizational coaching, it will be useful to introduce systemic thinking to help the client take a step back. For example, in team coaching, systems thinking teaches us that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Therefore, observing the interactions between the members/elements of a team will be more helpful in advancing the team system than the qualification of the qualities of the different members of the team or even the search for dysfunctional team members. It is an important factor to realize, according to Brian Bonar.

We know that resonance effects are to be sought in coaching. It is referred to as a parallel process or systemic reflection. If, in session, the coach feels a deep annoyance in contact with his client, this annoyance is likely a reflection of what the client usually arouses with those around him. It is essential to realize that professionals like Brian Bonar can make it easier to understand how to adopt the ideal approach to perform a task.